Page Comparison

Tip
It is a good idea to restrict evaluators' access to some or all of the submitted responses if: Prices tendered might influence an evaluator's assessment Subject matter experts can only assess some questions An individual has a potential conflict of interest with one or more providers (see notes below) The assessment task is being distributed across the evaluation team (see notes below)

Step-by-step guide

To begin the process:

...

Info

title	Notes

It is safe to select and deselect restrictions after the evaluations have started. Restricted evaluators' scores will be ignored - not deleted.
If a conflict of interest exists; it is the request manager's responsibility to manage the conflict. Options include:
1. Excluding the conflicted individual from the evaluation team
2. Restricting the conflicted individual from commercial-in-confidence information
3. Making the conflicted individual a non-scoring evaluator
360 does not support dividing the evaluation to-do list horizontally (groups of respondents) because some evaluators score more harshly than others, which can skew the rankings.
If you have a vast number of responses such that it is impractical for an evaluator to score every response, please:
1. Allocate evaluators to a sub-set of the responses (e.g. Mary & Hamid, you score A to L, Sam & I will score M to Z)
2. Use the Consensus Evaluator feature review and standardise the assessments

Versions Compared