How to assess risk when evaluating a provider's response in 360
Sometimes evaluators will have doubts about a provider's response to a criterion. If so, they have two options:
Give the provider a lower score and say why in the comments
Give the provider a full score and mark them down as being risky
Using a risk assessment separates the raw score from the risk assessed score, which can be helpful when making a final decision.
Step-by-step guide
To assess the risk for a request:
Sign-in to https://360users.apetsoftware.com.au/ as an Evaluator
Follow the steps in How to evaluate a request (e.g. for tender) in 360 to start the evaluation process
To include the risk assessment, click on the icon
Enter the Reasons for this risk assessment. This includes the description of the risk.
Select at least one context of the following for What is affected?
Cost - Risk of blow-out
Contract - Risk of variation
Offer - Risk of not being fit-for-purpose
Compliance - Risk of non-adherence to the contract
Performance - Risk of delay
Select the Consequence and Likelihood from the risk matrix
Click Save and Back to complete the risk assessment
At this point, there is a Raw Score and Risk Assessed Score.
The VFM (value for money) algorithm uses the Risk Assessed Score and the Question Score to rank each provider.
Each cell of the risk matrix has a percentage if the selected cell is Low (10%); a Raw Score of 8 results in a Risk Assessed Score of 7.2.
Related articles
Terms of use
Visitors who are not part of the intended audience (as specified on this space's overview page) may not access this content.
If you are accessing content for which you are not the intended audience you may not use it for any purpose.
As private content can be published in error, if in doubt, you are not the intended audience.
Copyright © - Sharrowlane Pty Ltd